Mask Image Mask Image
☰ Menu
Share Icon Share on Facebook Share on Bluesky Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn
Back to Top

American Compass

Overview

American Compass is a conservative think tank founded by Oren Cass in 2020 with the aim of reshaping the conservative economic agenda to prioritize family, community, and industry. The organization challenges the traditional free-market orthodoxy within conservative circles, advocating for policies that support American workers and industries while addressing the shortcomings of globalization and financialization. American Compass has quickly positioned itself as a key player in the debate over the future direction of conservative economic policy, particularly as the Republican Party reconsiders its economic priorities in a post-Trump era.

Mission and Activities

American Compass works to develop a conservative economic agenda that integrates traditional values with modern policy challenges. Key activities include:

Leadership and Influence

Connections to Trump

American Compass has connections to broader conservative movements, including affiliations with figures from the Trump administration. While Cass has critiqued certain aspects of Trump’s policies, particularly their execution, he acknowledges that Trump’s presidency marked a significant shift in the Republican Party’s economic priorities. The organization’s focus on reshaping economic policies and addressing the failures of globalization aligns with themes popularized during the Trump era, such as economic nationalism and skepticism of free trade. Moreover, American Compass has cultivated relationships with key Trump allies, including Senators JD Vance and Marco Rubio, who have supported its policy proposals.

Concerns

Conclusion

American Compass is a significant voice in the conservative economic policy debate, advocating for reforms that prioritize workers, families, and national industry. Its focus on rethinking traditional economic policies and promoting conservative values positions it as a key player in shaping the future of conservative economic agendas. However, its strong ideological orientation and willingness to break from traditional conservative economic orthodoxy necessitate careful consideration of its recommendations and potential biases.

Sources